[review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
Hi All,

I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review,
running from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon
with John (Phillips).

Now, when I look at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html 
it seems that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled,
greatly overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.

Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?

kind regards

Thorsten

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review, running
> from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon with John
> (Phillips).
>
> Now, when I look at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html it
> seems that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly
> overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
>
> Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?

A review date for Double_Ended was never published on the schedule.
The last state on that library on the review schedule was:

    Submission: Double-Ended
    Submitter: Benedek Thaler
    Review Manager: Needed
    Review Dates: -

This was before all unscheduled reviews were purged from the schedule.

Glen

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
Den 04-09-2017 kl. 18:50 skrev Glen Fernandes via Boost:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost  wrote:

>> Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
>
> A review date for Double_Ended was never published on the schedule.
> The last state on that library on the review schedule was:
>
>      Submission: Double-Ended
>      Submitter: Benedek Thaler
>      Review Manager: Needed
>      Review Dates: -
>
> This was before all unscheduled reviews were purged from the schedule.

I long ago (11th of May) contacted the review wizards:

http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Wizard

Only John replied, and he agreed to setting the date. After some time, I
asked if I had to update the review schedule (this is 26th of June), but
John said he would do it.

Are there review wizards that are not mentioned in the above page?

kind regards

Thorsten

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Den 04-09-2017 kl. 18:50 skrev Glen Fernandes via Boost:
>> A review date for Double_Ended was never published on the schedule.
>> The last state on that library on the review schedule was:
>>
>>      Submission: Double-Ended
>>      Submitter: Benedek Thaler
>>      Review Manager: Needed
>>      Review Dates: -
>>
>> This was before all unscheduled reviews were purged from the schedule.
>
>
> I long ago (11th of May) contacted the review wizards:
>
> http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Wizard
>
> Only John replied, and he agreed to setting the date. After some time, I
> asked if I had to update the review schedule (this is 26th of June), but
> John said he would do it.
>
> Are there review wizards that are not mentioned in the above page?

The page is still accurate. There was probably some disconnect between
the two wizards, because nobody else had any idea that Double-Ended
even had a review manager, let alone was scheduled for this week.

Glen

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
In reply to this post by Boost - Dev mailing list

   Thorsten,

   This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we start by
adding a week to the duration for each review (to give people who want
to participate in both time to do so) and run them as scheduled. Both
Fit and Double Ended did the right thing, and I made a mistake, so I
don't want to penalize either in any way if possible.

             John


On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review,
> running from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon
> with John (Phillips).
>
> Now, when I look at
> http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html it seems that
> there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly
> overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
>
> Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
>
> kind regards
>
> Thorsten


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
Hi John,

Fit received quite a bit of attention recently on the ML, it wouldn't be
fair to steal the show.
The schedule is empty otherwise - given that DoubleEnded is sitting there
for years, a few more days wouldn't hurt.

Thanks,
Benedek

On Sep 6, 2017 08:04, "John Phillips" <[hidden email]> wrote:


  Thorsten,

  This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we start by
adding a week to the duration for each review (to give people who want to
participate in both time to do so) and run them as scheduled. Both Fit and
Double Ended did the right thing, and I made a mistake, so I don't want to
penalize either in any way if possible.

            John



On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review,
> running from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon with
> John (Phillips).
>
> Now, when I look at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html
> it seems that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly
> overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
>
> Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
>
> kind regards
>
> Thorsten
>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list

   But, a few more days might make it harder for the Double Ended team
to be able to be as involved as they should in the review.

             John


On 09/06/2017 02:15 AM, Benedek Thaler wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Fit received quite a bit of attention recently on the ML, it wouldn't
> be fair to steal the show.
> The schedule is empty otherwise - given that DoubleEnded is sitting
> there for years, a few more days wouldn't hurt.
>
> Thanks,
> Benedek
>
> On Sep 6, 2017 08:04, "John Phillips" <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>
>       Thorsten,
>
>       This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we
>     start by adding a week to the duration for each review (to give
>     people who want to participate in both time to do so) and run them
>     as scheduled. Both Fit and Double Ended did the right thing, and I
>     made a mistake, so I don't want to penalize either in any way if
>     possible.
>
>                 John
>
>
>
>     On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>
>         Hi All,
>
>         I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended
>         review, running from today to 17th of September. This is what
>         we agreed upon with John (Phillips).
>
>         Now, when I look at
>         http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html
>         <http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html> it seems
>         that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled,
>         greatly overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
>
>         Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
>
>         kind regards
>
>         Thorsten
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
Den 06-09-2017 kl. 08:17 skrev John Phillips:
>
>   But, a few more days might make it harder for the Double Ended team
> to be able to be as involved as they should in the review.
>

Taking September 18th as a starting date works for both me and Benedek.
So I suggest that we reschedule to 18th to 28th of September.

kind regards

Thorsten

--
Best regards,
Thorsten Jørgen Ottosen, Ph.D.
Director of Research
+45 23308797
Dezide (www.dezide.com)


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
Den 06-09-2017 kl. 09:15 skrev Thorsten Ottosen via Boost:
> Den 06-09-2017 kl. 08:17 skrev John Phillips:
>>
>>   But, a few more days might make it harder for the Double Ended team
>> to be able to be as involved as they should in the review.
>>
>
> Taking September 18th as a starting date works for both me and Benedek.
> So I suggest that we reschedule to 18th to 28th of September.

John,

Please confirm that you saw this message. In case you need links, then
the git repos is:

https://github.com/erenon/double_ended

and documentation here:

http://erenon.hu/double_ended/

kind regards

Thorsten

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
Thorsten,

Does September 21-30 work for you and Benedek?  It is a good idea to keep a small buffer between reviews, especially in case an extension is needed.

Best,
Ron

> On Sep 8, 2017, at 7:18 AM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Den 06-09-2017 kl. 09:15 skrev Thorsten Ottosen via Boost:
>> Den 06-09-2017 kl. 08:17 skrev John Phillips:
>>>
>>>   But, a few more days might make it harder for the Double Ended team to be able to be as involved as they should in the review.
>>>
>> Taking September 18th as a starting date works for both me and Benedek. So I suggest that we reschedule to 18th to 28th of September.
>
> John,
>
> Please confirm that you saw this message. In case you need links, then the git repos is:
>
> https://github.com/erenon/double_ended
>
> and documentation here:
>
> http://erenon.hu/double_ended/
>
> kind regards
>
> Thorsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
On Sep 9, 2017 7:16 AM, "Ronald Garcia" <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thorsten,

Does September 21-30 work for you and Benedek?  It is a good idea to keep a
small buffer between reviews, especially in case an extension is needed.

Best,
Ron


Fine with me.

Thanks,
Benedek

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
Den 09-09-2017 kl. 16:36 skrev Benedek Thaler via Boost:
> On Sep 9, 2017 7:16 AM, "Ronald Garcia" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Thorsten,
>
> Does September 21-30 work for you and Benedek?  It is a good idea to keep a
> small buffer between reviews, especially in case an extension is needed.
>

Yes, that works for us too.

kind regards

Thorsten

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Boost - Dev mailing list
In reply to this post by Boost - Dev mailing list
Den 09-09-2017 kl. 16:36 skrev Benedek Thaler via Boost:
> On Sep 9, 2017 7:16 AM, "Ronald Garcia" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Thorsten,
>
> Does September 21-30 work for you and Benedek?  It is a good idea to keep a
> small buffer between reviews, especially in case an extension is needed.
>

That is fine for me too.

kind regards

Thorsten

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost