[review] Outcome Review Report

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
[review] Outcome Review Report – # Boost.Outcome REVIEW REPORT In conclusion to the Outcome Library Review (19-May to 02-June, 2017): The library is REJECTED. Rejection is prin...
charleyb123 wrote: > It is perhaps ironic that the suitability of a proposed library as > providing vocabulary types and possibly evolving...
> > charleyb123 wrote: > >> It is perhaps ironic that the suitability of a proposed library as >> providing vocabulary types ...
charleyb123 wrote: > My intended comment was to suggest that the library's potential popularity > caused, "the bar to be raised&qu...
On 06/06/2017 11:38 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote: > Yes, it is sometimes ironic how the potential for greatness leads > people to expe...
2017-06-06 14:34 GMT+02:00 charleyb123 . via Boost <boost@...>: > # Boost.Outcome REVIEW REPORT > Great thanks to the Boost Commun...
> Since conclusion of the review period, discussion continues (on and > off-list) regarding possible evolution to the Outcome library, relat...
Consider also "assume" instead of "accept": T & t = oc.assume_value(); ? On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Niall Douglas...
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:34 AM, charleyb123 wrote: > Great thanks to the Boost Community for their tremendous efforts, > disciplined revie...
Loading...