Re: boost_check_library.py: correct handling of header-only libs?
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> This script fails for me:
> <https://github.com/boostorg/boost/blob/master/status/ > boost_check_library.py#L30>
> Because there is no libs/beast/build. But Beast is header-only and has
> no src/ directory, is this correct?
> Apologies for posting to the list, but there is no Issues tab on the
> boostorg/boost repo.