|
|
|
|
Hi,
What's the status of boost::make_shared_array?
I've seen some discussion from 2009, but it's almost 2012 now and it
doesn't appear to be available.
Greetings,
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the status of boost::make_shared_array?
> I've seen some discussion from 2009, but it's almost 2012 now and it
> doesn't appear to be available.
Somebody?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What's the status of boost::make_shared_array?
>> I've seen some discussion from 2009, but it's almost 2012 now and it
>> doesn't appear to be available.
>
> Somebody?
Peter?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> What's the status of boost::make_shared_array?
> >> I've seen some discussion from 2009, but it's almost 2012 now and it
> >> doesn't appear to be available.
> >
> > Somebody?
>
> Peter?
I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Peter Dimov < [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> What's the status of boost::make_shared_array?
>> >> I've seen some discussion from 2009, but it's almost 2012 now and it
>> >> doesn't appear to be available.
>> >
>> > Somebody?
>>
>> Peter?
>
> I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
Can I help in any way?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Peter Dimov < [hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >> What's the status of boost::make_shared_array?
>>> >> I've seen some discussion from 2009, but it's almost 2012 now and it
>>> >> doesn't appear to be available.
>>> >
>>> > Somebody?
>>>
>>> Peter?
>>
>> I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
>
> Can I help in any way?
Peter?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Peter Dimov < [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> >> What's the status of boost::make_shared_array?
>>>> >> I've seen some discussion from 2009, but it's almost 2012 now and it
>>>> >> doesn't appear to be available.
>>>> >
>>>> > Somebody?
>>>>
>>>> Peter?
>>>
>>> I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
>>
>> Can I help in any way?
>
> Peter?
Why are you not answering peter?
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
>>
>> Can I help in any way?
The only way you can help is by implementing it, I guess. Unfortunately, I
don't think that this can be done, as in make_shared's case,
non-intrusively.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Peter Dimov < [hidden email]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
>>>> I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
>>>
>>> Can I help in any way?
>
> The only way you can help is by implementing it, I guess. Unfortunately, I
Do you have time to review and commit patches?
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4637 has been waiting for over a year.
> don't think that this can be done, as in make_shared's case,
> non-intrusively.
Why is that a problem?
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Olaf van der Spek < [hidden email]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Peter Dimov < [hidden email]> wrote:
>> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>
>>>>> I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
>>>>
>>>> Can I help in any way?
>>
>> The only way you can help is by implementing it, I guess. Unfortunately, I
>
> Do you have time to review and commit patches?
>
> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4637 has been waiting for over a year.
>
>> don't think that this can be done, as in make_shared's case,
>> non-intrusively.
>
Peter?
--
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
Hi Olaf,
Yes, I can review and apply patches. Regarding #4637, the patch makes the
following assumptions: (1) that an array of size 0 should create a NULL
pointer, which is not what new T[0] does, and (2) that the array should be
value-initialized, which may not be what the majority of the users want.
These design decisions should be discussed here among the scoped_array users
and settling them is a prerequisite for this patch to go in.
Incidentally, you'll need to make these same choices for make_shared_array
as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: Olaf van der Spek
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 20:00
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [boost] Status of boost::make_shared_array
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Peter Dimov < [hidden email]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
>>>> I don't have the time now to implement make_shared_array, sorry.
>>>
>>> Can I help in any way?
>
> The only way you can help is by implementing it, I guess. Unfortunately, I
Do you have time to review and commit patches?
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4637 has been waiting for over a
year.
> don't think that this can be done, as in make_shared's case,
> non-intrusively.
Why is that a problem?
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
|
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Peter Dimov < [hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> Yes, I can review and apply patches. Regarding #4637, the patch makes the
> following assumptions: (1) that an array of size 0 should create a NULL
> pointer, which is not what new T[0] does, and (2) that the array should be
> value-initialized, which may not be what the majority of the users want.
Valid points. Why didn't you raise them in the tracker?
> These design decisions should be discussed here among the scoped_array users
> and settling them is a prerequisite for this patch to go in.
>
> Incidentally, you'll need to make these same choices for make_shared_array
> as well.
I know. I'll start a thread.
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|
Locked
