Review Request: Boost Exception

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
40 messages Options
Review Request: Boost Exception – I believe the proposed Boost Exception library is now mature enough for formal review. Please read the documentation at: http://www.reverg...
No one has stepped up to volunteer to be the review manager. I suggest that you generate a little buzz around the library, post a couple of thr...
On 7/8/07, Tom Brinkman <reportbase@...> wrote: > No one has stepped up to volunteer to be the review manager. I > suggest that you...
I guess pointing at the documentation of the proposed Boost Exception counts as generating buzz :) http://www.revergestudios.com/boost-except...
Emil Dotchevski wrote: > I guess pointing at the documentation of the proposed Boost Exception counts > as generating buzz :) > >...
>> I am contemplating refactoring boost::filesystem to use the proposed >> boost::exception for demonstration purposes. Would anyone ...
Hi Emil, I have received your request and will add your Exception library to the review queue. Cheers, ron On Nov 12, 2006, at 9:36 P...
Hi boosters, On 11/20/06, Ronald Garcia <garcia@...> wrote: > Hi Emil, > > I have received your request and will add your Exc...
> > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:38:43 +0200 > From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov@...> > Subject: Re: [boost...
Matthew Herrmann <matthew.herrmann@...> writes: > I think Mr Abrahams is referring to an idea similar to this: (please > ignore t...
David Abrahams wrote: > void tag_exception(boost::exception& x) > { > // do something to x > } > > void read_file...
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@...> writes: > I prefer the second. Okay, good point. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www....
Peter Dimov said: (by the date of Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:54:14 +0200) > e.dismiss(); why this? destructor of e does the work. No nee...
Janek Kozicki wrote: > Peter Dimov said: (by the date of Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:54:14 +0200) > >> e.dismiss(); > > why...
Peter Dimov said: (by the date of Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:18:22 +0200) > Janek Kozicki wrote: > > Peter Dimov said: (by the date ...
>Peter Dimov said: (by the date of Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:18:22 +0200) > > > Janek Kozicki wrote: > > > Peter Dimov said:...
----Original Message---- From: boost-bounces@... [mailto:boost-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Janek Kozicki Sent: 16 November 2006 07:04 To: boost@....
David Abrahams wrote: > Matthew Herrmann <matthew.herrmann@...> writes: > >> I think Mr Abrahams is referring to an idea simi...
"Emil Dotchevski" <emildotchevski@...> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> >> void tag_exception(boost::excepti...
Matthew Herrmann wrote: > To remove the e.success(), > you'd need to detect whether the stack was being unwound due to an > exceptio...
> > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:06:03 -0800 > From: "Emil Dotchevski" <emildotchevski@...> > Subject...
"Emil Dotchevski" <emildotchevski@...> writes: > I believe the proposed Boost Exception library is now mature enough for &...
David Abrahams wrote: > Finally, a design note: I don't like the fact that I need a try/catch > block in order to adorn the currently-un...
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@...> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: > >> Finally, a design note: I don't like the fact tha...
David Abrahams wrote: > "Peter Dimov" <pdimov@...> writes: > >> Moving the catch clause to a destructor doesn't se...
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@...> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov@...> writes: >...
>> Won't you need to prepare all the extra information even if nothing throws? > No, you could do it lazily. Thats a good point, ph...
David Abrahams wrote: > "Peter Dimov" <pdimov@...> writes: > >> David Abrahams wrote: >>> "Peter Di...
David Abrahams wrote: > The first example uses "error_info_value" without qualification. You > need to test your examples. ...
"Emil Dotchevski" <emildotchevski@...> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: > >> The first example uses "error_in...
> I believe the proposed Boost Exception library is now mature enough for > formal review. > > Please read the documentation at: &...
Zach Laine wrote: >> I believe the proposed Boost Exception library is now mature enough >> for formal review. >> >> P...
<snip> > > boost::exception's constructors and destructor are in its online docs, > > but are not part of its public interface...
Zach Laine wrote: > <snip> >>> It would be nice to have the actual headers linked to somewhere in >>> the online doc...
On 11/14/06, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski@...> wrote: > Zach Laine wrote: > > <snip> > >>> It would be nice...
>>> <snip> >>> That's correct, but I think a likelier scenario for standardization >>> would be to include Boos...
Zach Laine wrote: > That's correct, but I think a likelier scenario for standardization > would be to include Boost.Exception as-is, so ...
"Zach Laine" <whatwasthataddress@...> writes: > As for the library itself, the name "exception" is fine within the...
David Abrahams wrote: > "Zach Laine" <whatwasthataddress@...> writes: > >> As for the library itself, the name &quo...
I found a subtle bug regarding exception::what(). I remember fixing this same bug once when it was pointed to me after the preliminary submissio...