> On Sep 9, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Andrea Bocci <[hidden email]> wrote:
> maybe it's too late, but I hadn't seen this library before on the boost-users list.
> Would you consider a different name ?
I have been considering using the name HigherOrderFunctions(or HOF for short), which seems better to describe the library.
> In the context of mathematical and statistical analysis, a "fit" is something else entirely - still related to "functions".
> Reading that "Fit is a header-only ... library that provides utilities for functions..." I was expecting something quite different ;-)