Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:

> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>
> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>
> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>
> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>
> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:

* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)

  1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
  there a random_shuffle.
  2) Boost.Wave failed due to errors in Spirit. There's no auto_ptr in
  std:: anymore.
  3) Boost.Locale failed, again because of auto_ptr.

* GCC (-std=c++14)

  Everything builds fine.

I would like to complain about the amount of warnings though... Way to
many for my taste.


Tom

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :

> On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>>
>> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>>
>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>>
>> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
>> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
>> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
>> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>>
>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
>> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
>> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>
> Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
>
> * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
>
>   1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
>   there a random_shuffle.

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by
#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE

and the ones of bind1st by
#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS

Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?

Thanks for the report,
Raffi


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
On 07/08/2017, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
> The calls to random_shuffle are protected by #ifdef
> BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
>
> and the ones of bind1st by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
>
> Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?
>
> Thanks for the report, Raffi

It could be me, but I've run a grep on these macros:
    for f in $(find ./boost/config -type f); do echo $f: $(grep
"NO_CXX98" $f); done
And only boost/config/stdlib/dinkumware.hpp gave some results. Could it
be the case that some parts of Config haven't been updated to support the
latest version of libc++ yet?


Tom

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
In reply to this post by Boost - Dev mailing list
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :
>
>> On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>>>
>>> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>>>
>>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>>>
>>> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
>>> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
>>> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
>>> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>>>
>>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
>>> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
>>> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>>>
>>
>> Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
>>
>> * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
>>
>>   1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
>>   there a random_shuffle.
>>
>
> The calls to random_shuffle are protected by
> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
>
> and the ones of bind1st by
> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
>
> Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?
>
>
As a test, I added the following lines to
libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp (after line 98):
#if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
!defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
#  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
#endif
#if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
!defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
#  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
#endif

and the number of failures dropped quite a bit (66 to 23)

There was still few Boost.Test failures, though:


clang-darwin.compile.c++
bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/unit_test_parameters.o
In file included from libs/test/src/unit_test_parameters.cpp:16:
In file included from ./boost/test/impl/unit_test_parameters.ipp:39:
In file included from ./boost/test/utils/runtime/cla/parser.hpp:24:
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:118:42: error: no member named 'bind1st'
in namespace 'std'
        if( std::find_if( first2, last2, BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *first1
) ) == last2 )
                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro
'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST'
#define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) )
                                ~~~~~^
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:168:60: error: no member named 'bind1st'
in namespace 'std'
    while( --it1 != first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2,
BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) == last2 ) {}

 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro
'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST'
#define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) )
                                ~~~~~^
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:170:58: error: no member named 'bind1st'
in namespace 'std'
    return it1 == first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2,
BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) == last2 ? last1 : it1;

 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro
'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST'
#define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) )
                                ~~~~~^
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:215:60: error: no member named 'bind1st'
in namespace 'std'
    while( --it1 != first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2,
BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) != last2 ) {}

 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro
'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST'
#define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) )
                                ~~~~~^
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:217:58: error: no member named 'bind1st'
in namespace 'std'
    return it1 == first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2,
BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) == last2 ? last1 : it1;

 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro
'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST'
#define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) )
                                ~~~~~^
5 errors generated.

    "/Sources/LLVM/bin/bin/clang++" -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions
-Wno-variadic-macros -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++ -I
/Sources/LLVM/llvm/projects/libcxx -O3 -O3 -Wno-inline -Wall -pedantic
-DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_DYN_LINK=1
-DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED -DBOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK=1
-DBOOST_TIMER_DYN_LINK=1 -DNDEBUG -I"." -c -o
"bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/unit_test_parameters.o"
"libs/test/src/unit_test_parameters.cpp"

...failed clang-darwin.compile.c++
bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/unit_test_parameters.o...

-- and --

clang-darwin.compile.c++
bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/framework.o
In file included from libs/test/src/framework.cpp:16:
./boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:745:30: error: no member named
'random_shuffle' in namespace 'std'
                        std::random_shuffle(
children_with_the_same_rank.begin(), children_with_the_same_rank.end(),
rand_gen );
                        ~~~~~^
1 error generated.

    "/Sources/LLVM/bin/bin/clang++" -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions
-Wno-variadic-macros -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++ -I
/Sources/LLVM/llvm/projects/libcxx -O3 -O3 -Wno-inline -Wall -pedantic
-DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_DYN_LINK=1
-DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED -DBOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK=1
-DBOOST_TIMER_DYN_LINK=1 -DNDEBUG -I"." -c -o
"bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/framework.o"
"libs/test/src/framework.cpp"

...failed clang-darwin.compile.c++
bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/framework.o...


These *may* (I haven't traced it yet) be due to the configuration header
didn't get included in this case.

-- Marshall

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Marshall Clow <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :
>>
>>> On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>>>>
>>>> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>>>>
>>>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>>>>
>>>> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
>>>> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
>>>> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
>>>> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>>>>
>>>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
>>>> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
>>>> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
>>>
>>> * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
>>>
>>>   1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
>>>   there a random_shuffle.
>>>
>>
>> The calls to random_shuffle are protected by
>> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
>>
>> and the ones of bind1st by
>> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
>>
>> Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?
>>
>>
> As a test, I added the following lines to libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp
> (after line 98):
> #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
> !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
> #  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
> #endif
> #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
> !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
> #  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
> #endif
>
> Ignore these results; I edited the wrong version of the file.
New results soon.

-- Marshall

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
In reply to this post by Boost - Dev mailing list
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :
>
>> On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>>>
>>> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>>>
>>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>>>
>>> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
>>> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
>>> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
>>> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>>>
>>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
>>> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
>>> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>>>
>>
>> Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
>>
>> * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
>>
>>   1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
>>   there a random_shuffle.
>>
>
> The calls to random_shuffle are protected by
> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
>
> and the ones of bind1st by
> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
>
> Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?
>
>
As a test, I added the following lines to
libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp:

#if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
!defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
#  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
#endif
#if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
!defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
#  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
#endif

and Boost.Test build successfully.

Locale, Wave, and fiber still failed.

I will prepare a PR for Boost.config.

-- Marshall

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
Le 07.08.17 à 02:51, Marshall Clow via Boost a écrit :

> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :
>>
>>> On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>>>>
>>>> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>>>>
>>>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>>>>
>>>> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
>>>> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
>>>> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
>>>> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
>>>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>>>>
>>>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
>>>> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
>>>> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
>>>
>>> * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
>>>
>>>   1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
>>>   there a random_shuffle.
>>>
>>
>> The calls to random_shuffle are protected by
>> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
>>
>> and the ones of bind1st by
>> #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
>>
>> Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?
>>
>>
> As a test, I added the following lines to
> libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp:
>
> #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
> !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
> #  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
> #endif
> #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
> !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
> #  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
> #endif
>
> and Boost.Test build successfully.
>
> Locale, Wave, and fiber still failed.
>
> I will prepare a PR for Boost.config.
>
> -- Marshall

Wonderful! many thanks for the super quick analysis and fix!


Raffi



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
In reply to this post by Boost - Dev mailing list
On 08/07/17 01:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost wrote:

> On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
>> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
>> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>
> Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
>
> * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
>
>    2) Boost.Wave failed due to errors in Spirit. There's no auto_ptr in
>    std:: anymore.

The current Boost.Spirit master doesn't use std::auto_ptr. It was
removed in e361754faf62b8b513cfc5b39f3153be92342454 more than a year ago
from develop. I think, Joel merged it to master today, so the release
needs to update too.

The current Boost.Wave master still uses std::auto_ptr in samples (which
I think is code examples). It was fixed in develop[1] but not have been
merged to master.

[1]: https://github.com/boostorg/wave/pull/11

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Boost - Dev mailing list
In reply to this post by Boost - Dev mailing list
Hello,

On 06.08.17 21:07, Marshall Clow via Boost-users wrote:

>
> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>
> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>
> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>
> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
>   boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
>   boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
>   boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
>   boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>
> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download
> the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report
> both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Could you please include https://github.com/boostorg/fiber/pull/140 in
the final release?

Thanks,
Gregor

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Loading...